Book Review
Book Reviewby The Chrysalis BREW Project
The book opens with a deceptively simple question: does God exist? From there, it unfolds not as a narrative but as an investigation, where each claim is treated like testimony. Scientific observations—such as the expanding universe and the irreversible nature of entropy—are introduced not as conclusions, but as pieces of circumstantial evidence. Much like how a single footprint can suggest a presence, these observations are used to build a broader case about order, causation, and origin.
What makes the work distinctive is its insistence on consistency. If multiple belief systems offer conflicting accounts of reality, the author argues, they cannot all be correct in the same way. This is not presented as a philosophical abstraction but as a practical problem, similar to conflicting witness statements in a courtroom. The reader is encouraged to weigh each claim, not based on tradition or familiarity, but on its source and supporting evidence.
The exploration of world religions is both wide-ranging and structured. Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, and several modern spiritual movements are discussed alongside Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Each is examined through the same lens: where does the information come from, and can it be verified? This repeated question becomes the backbone of the book, offering a sense of cohesion even as the subject matter shifts across cultures and centuries.
At times, the tone becomes firm, especially when addressing positions that rely heavily on assumption or speculation. Yet this firmness is consistent with the book’s central framework. In a courtroom, neutrality does not mean avoiding conclusions; it means arriving at them through a defined process. The author maintains that approach throughout, which gives the work a sense of purpose and direction.
There are moments where scientific and philosophical ideas intersect in interesting ways. The discussion of DNA as an information system, for instance, echoes widely accepted biological principles about coded complexity. Similarly, the treatment of causality aligns with foundational concepts in both physics and philosophy. These intersections help ground the discussion, making abstract ideas more tangible.
This book is well-suited for readers who appreciate structured reasoning and are comfortable engaging with big questions in a systematic way. It will appeal to those who enjoy analyzing ideas, comparing frameworks, and following an argument to its logical conclusion. Readers looking for an open-ended or purely exploratory discussion may find the approach more decisive than expected, but that decisiveness is part of its design.
In the end, the book does not simply ask what is true—it asks how we decide what is true. And in doing so, it invites readers to step into the role of both witness and juror, examining not just the evidence presented, but the standards by which they evaluate it.
This Award-Winning Book is AVAILABLE THROUGH AMAZON.COM
Book Review by Mihir Shah
Some of the most intriguing conversations happen during "cooler talk." The origins of Adams' work begin in the same way: a lunchtime conversation that has transformed into a thought-provoking commentary on understanding God and religion from the secular prism of circumstantial evidence. Though there are infinite texts delving into this topic, few put religion on the stand in such an illuminating way. From atheism and the Jewish faith to Hinduism, Buddhism, and more, the author is comprehensive in his scope while maintaining an easy-to-digest conversational tone. Adams first explores each potential God story individually and impartially. Logic, he insists, suggests that the initial step before deciding which god is God is to establish that this divine force indeed exists. Bearing the burden of proof, the author cites both English astronomer Sir Arthur Eddington and the footprints in the sand in Defoe's Robinson Crusoe to show how science and spirituality are intertwined forces rather than clashing mechanisms.
Addressing the shortcomings of other religions, Adams zeroes in on the notion of validating one's status as God's agent to ensure their message is heard. Whether it is with the polytheistic nature of Hinduism, or Muhammad's nature in Islam, neither can be attributed as God's messenger. Interestingly, the idea of using miracles as evidence of God directly leads one to Christianity, where there are countless examples, including God entrusting Moses to lead his people out of Egypt. The core of Adams' argument rests on the notion of historical evidence. Where many religions are rooted in myth (e.g., Hinduism), the author notes the historical relevance and evidence in the Hebrew scriptures that underscore their standing among the various faiths. Overall, Adams' background in law serves him well, allowing him to deliver a cohesive argument that probes deeper into the mysteries of religion.
Adrian J. Adams, Esq.
Adrian served in the Marine Corps before earning a degree in psychology, with minors in chemistry and biology. He went on to earn an MBA from UCLA and a law degree from Southwestern Law School. He established a boutique law firm that specializes in corporate counsel to boards of directors of common interest developments and served as president of two nonprofit foundations.
FEEDBACK
Books about God tend to either preach at you or dismiss faith entirely and Adams does neither. He lays out what Hinduism Islam Buddhism Christianity and the others actually claim and then asks which of those claims hold up under scrutiny. The decision to start with whether God exists at all before getting into which religion was the right call. Four stars because readers should know going in that he does reach a conclusion rather than leaving it fully open. That said the journey to get there is worth every page. -Angelina M.
Wasn't sure what to expect and the accessibility caught me off guard in a good way. Avoids unnecessary jargon while still dealing with genuinely complex topics. The comparisons between belief systems feel fair and systematic and the legal approach adds a clarity that kept my attention longer than I expected. Deep topics handled in a way that doesn't require a philosophy background to follow. -Rebecca
This book pushes you to think critically about what you believe. I liked how it doesn’t assume one viewpoint from the start. The evidence-style structure makes each claim feel examined rather than stated. It covers a wide range of religions in a balanced way. I came away reflecting more than I usually do after reading on this topic. -Tiffany
I appreciated how the book presents multiple religions without rushing or oversimplifying them. The structured format made it easy to keep track of ideas. I liked how it raises big questions about existence and spirituality. The tone feels measured and thoughtful. I felt that gave me a clearer overview of how different belief systems approach the same questions. -Sandra W.
This book stands out because of its logical approach. I liked how it compares major world religions side by side without rushing through them. The legal framework gives it a unique angle that’s easy to follow. It doesn’t feel preachy or dismissive, just methodical. I appreciated how it made complex ideas more digestible. -Jeannie
This is, without a doubt, one of the finest books on apologetics that I’ve ever read. It has an amazing bibliography. -Frank F.
Your book is well written and very clear. I especially liked the courtroom scene in chapter 18. It is an excellent apologetics book, so I passed it on to a teacher at San Marcos College. He was delighted, and I know he will make good use of it. –Marcia R.
I am recommending this book to the 200 men in leadership positions in our church. –Rev. Stonier
Thank you so much for your book. I found it to be a well-articulated apologetic, and your thoughts on the Trinity were especially helpful. –Rev. Allers
I finished reading your book and loved it! Can't believe you have 26 pages of references and footnotes. –Pat C.
Thank you for “Which god is God?” I finished Chapter 1 and was very encouraged by the way you approached “Does God Exist?” It was clearly laid out with plenty of quotes by leading scientific thinkers. And with the simple eloquence of reason, you did a superb job. –Mike M.
Finished the book this afternoon and loved it. Very, very well done and compelling evidence. –Tom
Thanx so much for the grrreat book. It is truly a magnificent read. Everything in it was right on. The perspective is unique and awesome. –Cray S.
Just wanted to thank you for the book. It was a wonderful read. –Sandy B.
I am enjoying a lawyer’s perspective and logic in presenting the assurance that Jesus Christ is, in fact, the Savior of the world. –David C.
Wow! Didn’t know this existed. When did you find time to write it?? Thanks so much for sharing it with us. We’re both trying to read it at the same time. So good right from the start—we are devouring it. –Patti C.
Thank you for the wonderful book! I loved it! It was excellently done. I love the legal explanations and defenses for an eternal and God-given gift—His Son, Jesus Christ. –John
I finished your book, and it’s a fine apologetic work. –Charles A.
PENCRAFT BOOK REVIEW
In Which God Is God?, attorney Adrian J. Adams provides a compelling investigation into the diverse ways human cultures define the divine. The central premise of the work is an exploration of whether any religion can validly claim to speak for God by applying the rigorous standards of legal evidence to spiritual claims. Rather than relying on simple summaries, Adams asks which traditions can substantiate their source of information with credible, relevant evidence.
The book examines a vast array of religious perspectives, from major world faiths like Hinduism, Judaism, and Islam to smaller traditions like Taoism and various branches of the New Age movement, including Raëlians and Wiccans. Adams contrasts these views by analyzing their differing concepts of spiritual authority, such as the personal, monotheistic God of the Judeo-Christian tradition versus the impersonal forces or "god-forces" described in Eastern philosophies. He further explores the nature of belief by distinguishing between faiths that view time as linear and those that believe in the cyclical nature of reincarnation.
Adams’s theoretical approach is uniquely grounded in the principles of courtroom evidence. He utilizes comparative religious study, historical analysis, and scriptural interpretation to evaluate "witness" testimony. For example, he uses the Federal Rules of Evidence to test whether religious founders possess "personal knowledge" or if their claims are merely speculative. By focusing on authentication methods—such as miracles and fulfilled prophecy—his research style shapes a narrative of rigorous inquiry without prematurely disclosing his final verdict on the question he poses.
This investigative style will likely resonate with readers interested in theology, comparative religion, or philosophical inquiry who appreciate a systematic approach to the "conflicts in religious claims". Conversely, the book may challenge readers with strict doctrinal commitments or those who are uncomfortable with subjecting long-held religious assumptions to "legal scrutiny". Those who hold firm, exclusive beliefs about their own tradition may find parts of the discussion challenging or even unsettling. Adams’s willingness to question sacred assumptions is likely to provoke both admiration and discomfort.
Adams’s background as a lawyer, provides the authority for this broad religious summation. His professional experience in resolving conflicts and his personal study of world religions contribute significant credibility to the work. By treating spiritual claims as cases to be tried, Adams offers a balanced and respectful survey that invites readers to weigh the evidence for themselves.
